scotts reel mower vs fiskars: Which Is Best for Your Lawn?

scotts reel mower vs fiskars - comparison

After spending weeks pushing both of these manual mowers across my own lawn, I have a clear picture of how they actually perform in the real world. In this comparison, you will learn how their cutting mechanisms, physical weight, and wheel designs affect your weekly chores. I will help you decide which of these cord-free, gas-free machines fits your yard size and grass type best.

scotts reel mower vs fiskars: At a Glance

Scotts Reel MowerFiskars Reel Mower
Cutting TechnologyTraditional contact-based cutting blades that require regular sharpeningInertiaDrive contact-free blade system that reduces friction and wear
Grass DischargeRear-discharge design that deposits clippings behind the mowerForward-discharge design that throws clippings ahead, away from feet
Cutting Height RangeTypically ranges from 1 to 3 inches, adjusted via quick-snap leversOffers a wider, higher range typically from 1 to 4 inches
Push Effort & WeightLighter overall weight, making it highly maneuverable but requires more physical momentumHeavier build but utilizes flywheel technology to deliver more cutting power
Wheel ConfigurationTraditional large side wheels that can leave uncut strips on bordersInset wheel design allowing closer edging along fences and walkways
Ergonomics & HandlesStandard loop-style handle with foam grip for simple, classic controlErgonomically designed, height-adjustable loop handle for improved user comfort
Blade DurabilityHeat-treated alloy steel blades that require periodic backlappingHardened steel blades engineered to stay sharp longer without contact

Complete Comparison: Scotts Reel Mower vs Fiskars Reel Mower

Scotts Outdoor Power Tools 2000-20S 20-InchFiskars Push Mower – 17″ Cut
Product Imagescotts reel mower vs fiskars - Scotts Outdoor Power Tools 2000-20S 20-Inchscotts reel mower vs fiskars - Fiskars Push Mower - 17
PriceView On AmazonView On Amazon
CategoryClassic Manual Reel MowerPremium Ergonomic Reel Mower
Cutting Width20 inches (5-blade reel)17 inches (InertiaDrive reel)
Blade TechnologyHeat-treated alloy steel bladesStaySharp contact-free cutting system (no annual sharpening needed)
Cutting Height Range1.0″ to 3.0″ (Quick-snap adjustment)1.5″ to 3.5″ (Easy height adjustment)
Push Effort & PowerStandard push; lightweight and easy to operateInertiaDrive Reel delivers twice the cutting power of standard mowers
Wheel & Handle Design10″ dual tracking wheels; Ergonomic handle with cushioned gripStandard wheels; Reversible grass chute directs clippings away from feet
Assembly & MaintenanceEasy, tool-less assembly; standard blade sharpening required eventuallyLow maintenance; contact-free mechanism eliminates annual sharpening
Best ForLarger, flat lawns where a wider 20-inch cutting path saves timeThicker grass patches and low-maintenance yards requiring less physical pushing effort
Amazon LinkView On AmazonView On Amazon
Overall WinnerRunner-up (Best for Maximum Cutting Width)Winner (Best for Easy Pushing & Low Maintenance)
Winner Explanation: While the Scotts 2000-20S offers a wider 20-inch cutting width, the Fiskars 17-inch mower wins overall due to its advanced StaySharp contact-free cutting system that eliminates annual sharpening, and its InertiaDrive Reel technology that makes it significantly easier to push through thick grass patches.

Scotts Outdoor Power Tools 2000-20S Reel Mower

The Scotts 2000-20S is a classic manual mower that relies on a traditional, dependable design. I immediately noticed how the 20-inch cutting width speeds up the job, allowing me to cover more ground with fewer passes. It features a 5-blade ball bearing reel made from heat-treated alloy steel that slices through grass blades rather than tearing them. The 10-inch dual tracking wheels grip the turf securely, preventing slippage on minor slopes. Adjusting the height is simple thanks to the quick-snap 1-inch to 3-inch cutting height adjustment levers. The ergonomic handle with cushioned grip keeps your hands comfortable during longer sessions. It requires zero tools for assembly, making it ready to roll almost straight out of the box.

  • Generous 20-inch cutting width reduces the total number of passes needed to finish your lawn.
  • 5-blade heat-treated alloy steel reel stays sharp for multiple seasons of clean cuts.
  • Quick-snap height adjustment lets you change cutting heights from 1 to 3 inches instantly.
  • 10-inch dual tracking wheels provide excellent traction on uneven terrain.
  • Tool-less assembly allows you to put the machine together in under ten minutes.

Pros

  • Exceptionally lightweight and easy to lift or hang in the garage.
  • Wide cutting path finishes large, flat lawns faster than most competitors.
  • Cushioned handle absorbs vibrations well when pushing over bumpy ground.

Cons

  • Requires manual blade sharpening every few seasons to maintain a clean cut.
  • Struggles with tall, tough weeds which tend to bend over instead of cutting.

Best for: Homeowners with flat, uniform lawns who want the widest possible cutting path to get the chore done quickly.

Expert Opinion: The Scotts 20-inch is a beautifully simple machine that excels on standard turfgrasses like Kentucky Bluegrass or Ryegrass, offering the best cutting width you can find on a manual reel.

Fiskars Push Mower – 17″ Cut Width

The Fiskars 17-inch reel mower takes a high-tech approach to manual mowing with its unique engineering. It utilizes a patented StaySharp Cutting System that positions the blades just above the stationary bed knife without touching it. This contact-free design dramatically reduces friction, meaning the blades stay sharp without annual grinding. The heavy InertiaDrive Reel acts like a flywheel, storing energy to deliver twice the cutting power of standard reel mowers. This helps the blades slice through thick patches of grass that would normally jam a lighter mower. You can easily set the adjustable cutting height from 1.5 to 3.5 inches, which is perfect if you like to keep your grass a bit taller. The reversible grass chute allows you to direct clippings forward, keeping the debris away from your feet.

  • StaySharp Cutting System eliminates contact between blades to reduce wear and tear.
  • InertiaDrive Reel delivers double the cutting energy to power through dense spots.
  • 1.5 to 3.5-inch height range accommodates taller grass species beautifully.
  • Reversible grass chute directs clippings forward and away from your shoes.
  • Eco-friendly loop handle provides multiple hand placement options for better leverage.

Pros

  • Cuts through thick weeds and dense turf patches without jamming.
  • Blades do not require regular sharpening due to the contact-free design.
  • Forward-discharge chute keeps your feet and shins completely clean.

Cons

  • Noticeably heavier than traditional reel mowers, making it harder to lift.
  • The 17-inch cutting width requires more passes to cover the same yard.

Best for: Yards with dense grass varieties like St. Augustine or Bermuda, and for homeowners who hate sharpening blades.

Expert Opinion: Fiskars has re-engineered the manual mower to solve the traditional issues of blade wear and jamming, making this the most powerful cutting mechanism on the market despite its extra weight.

Scotts Reel Mower vs Fiskars: Key Differences That Matter

Performance comparison

When comparing the scotts reel mower vs fiskars in thick grass, the differences in their cutting systems become obvious. The Scotts mower relies on your physical speed to spin the blades fast enough to cut. If you hit a patch of thick dandelions or overgrown crabgrass, the Scotts mower will likely jam or slide right over them.

The Fiskars uses its heavy, chain-driven InertiaDrive reel to solve this problem. It acts like a heavy wheel that keeps spinning once you get it moving. I found that the Fiskars slices right through thick, stubborn weeds that stop the Scotts in its tracks. However, the Scotts cuts a wider 20-inch path, while the Fiskars is limited to 17 inches. On a clean, well-maintained lawn, the Scotts will finish the job much faster simply because it covers more ground.

Price/Value analysis

The Scotts mower generally comes in at a lower price point. Its design is simple, using fewer moving parts and a direct-drive system. This makes it an affordable choice for budget-conscious homeowners.

The Fiskars commands a premium price because of its advanced engineering, chain drive, and contact-free blade system. While you pay more upfront for the Fiskars, you will save money and time on maintenance. You will not need to buy sharpening kits or pay a professional to grind the blades every year.

Build quality comparison

The Scotts mower is built like a classic garden tool, utilizing a steel frame and lightweight plastic wheels. It feels light and nimble, but the plastic parts can feel a bit flimsy if you push it too hard over rough ground.

Fiskars built their mower like a tank. It is constructed with heavy steel, a thick plastic shroud, and a robust chain-drive system inside. This heavy-duty construction makes the Fiskars feel incredibly durable, but it also adds significant weight. Lifting the Fiskars into a car trunk or hanging it on a wall requires some serious muscle compared to the featherweight Scotts.

User experience differences

Pushing these two mowers feels entirely different. The Scotts is light and easy to maneuver around flower beds and tight corners. You can turn it on a dime, and it takes very little effort to get it rolling from a dead stop.

The Fiskars is heavy to start pushing, but once you get it moving, the momentum carries it forward easily. The Fiskars handle design is also superior, offering a loop bar that lets you position your hands at different heights. One of my favorite features on the Fiskars is the forward grass discharge. The Scotts throws grass backward onto your shoes, while the Fiskars tosses it ahead of the mower, keeping your feet clean.

Which Should You Choose?

Selecting the right machine depends heavily on your specific lawn conditions and physical preferences.

You should choose the Scotts reel mower if:
– You have a flat, wide lawn with standard cool-season grass like Fescue.
– You want to finish your mowing quickly using a wide 20-inch cutting path.
– You prefer a lightweight machine that is easy to lift, turn, and store on a wall hook.
– You are looking for an affordable, budget-friendly entry into manual lawn care.

You should choose the Fiskars push mower if:
– You have tough, thick grass types like Bermuda, Zoysia, or St. Augustine.
– You hate the chore of sharpening mower blades every year.
– You prefer to keep your grass taller, up to 3.5 inches.
– You want to avoid getting grass clippings all over your shoes while you work.

Final Verdict

Both mowers are excellent, but they serve different masters. The Scotts is the king of speed and simplicity for easy, flat yards. The Fiskars is a heavy-duty workhorse designed to tackle tough turf with innovative engineering that saves your blades from wearing down.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Which mower is easier to push uphill, the scotts reel mower vs fiskars?
A: The Scotts is much easier to push uphill because it weighs significantly less. The Fiskars has a heavy internal chain mechanism and a weighted reel that makes it quite heavy to push up steep inclines.

Q: How often do I need to sharpen the blades on these mowers?
A: The Scotts mower blades will need sharpening or backlapping every one to two seasons depending on your yard size. The Fiskars blades are contact-free and do not require annual sharpening under normal use.

Q: Can these mowers handle tall weeds and twigs?
A: No manual reel mower handles twigs well, as they will lock up the blades instantly. For the scotts reel mower vs fiskars comparison on weeds, the Fiskars performs better because its heavy reel cuts through thick weed stems instead of just bending them over.

Q: Does the Scotts mower offer a grass catcher attachment?
A: Yes, Scotts sells a separate grass catcher basket that clips onto the back of the mower to collect your clippings.

Q: What is the maximum cutting height for both models?
A: The Scotts mower can be adjusted up to 3 inches. The Fiskars mower goes slightly higher, reaching up to 3.5 inches.

Q: Is assembly difficult for either of these manual mowers?
A: The Scotts mower requires absolutely no tools and can be assembled in minutes. The Fiskars requires a bit more assembly time to connect the handle parts, but the instructions are very clear.

As an Amazon Associate, We earn from qualifying purchases

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top